Educated health care consumers will provide a groundwork for consumers to demand access to alternative health care solutions via their existing health care provider networks, insurance companies, and practitioners.

Think of this hypothetical exaggerated scenario:

A patient complains to doctor of dark brown liver spots appearing on their face and body, their teeth are coming loose and falling out, and they are depressed. (Probably because they have liver spots and are losing their teeth.)

The PCP diagnosis an extreme Scurvy and write a prescription for asorbic acid to combat the disease, and an anti-depressant to combat the depression.

Soon, the teeth are sitting solidly, liver spots have stopped appearing, and the patient needs only to de-tox off the anti-depressant. They payed a co-pay to their insurance company for the asorbic acid prescription, which was cheaper than buying the non-prescription bottle of over the counter chewable vitamin C tablets (asorbic acid).

What the doctor AND the patient didn't know was that most other countries treat the disease successfully by simply adding a healthy dose of oranges to the diet.

Or that in 1536, Jacques Cartier was exploring the St. Lawrence River, and he used the local natives' recipe for tea -boiled needles from the arbor vitae tree (eastern white cedars), and thus saved his men who were dying of scurvy. This tea was later proven to contain 50 mg of vitamin C per 100 grams.

More information, more choices... and a lot less cost, control, and censorship. That's really the bottom line.

Censorship of health care knowledge coming out of highly qualified organizations in countries like India, China, Africa and Russia reduce personal health care choices. Many treatments do not require health insurance. Or medicine. Or surgery. Or, at least, less of it. This hurts the profit margins of our health care industry. Hence, the walls of censorship are fiercely protected.

"Uncensored Healthcare" establishes an internet based online global health care and research facility for access to both consumers of health care, and to worldwide medical and science communities for affordable peer support and collaboration of online research, findings, publications and review processes.

"Open access" to scientific and medical publications and knowledge bases will speed up the flow of knowledge exponentially, allowing advancements to flourish unhindered.

Beneficiaries of open access to "Uncensored Healthcare"include:

-Established well funded professionals who can now publish and collaborate debatable or controversial material which would not be supported by the traditional peer publishing process.

-Established professionals with limited funding. Equally as qualified, they can't afford the time consuming, unguaranteed and non-refundable high cost of publishing and collaboration.

-Students, professionals in small or less industrialized countries, NFPs, ventures surviving on grants, donations, or contributions.

-Ultimately, the health care consumers who will have free access to information about choices in health care.

A good friend and the Phd responsible for the lead poisoning awareness initiative in upstate Rochester, New York, born in Africa, and educated in African universities, volunteers as a peer for abstract reviews of budding scientists. From him I learned that less than 10% of all scientific work ever gets published. His knowledge of cancer research findings and treatments alone that have gone unpublished is daunting. The censorship is criminal.

Other exposure I have is a result of technically enabling non-westernized science and medical businesses and practices who are my clients, not all necessarily based in the United States, and none of whom advocate practicing westernized medicine only, to apply technology to spread their knowledge and practice.