|
>View discussions about this entry Country: Philippines
Organization: Ateneo School of Government
Focus of activity - Community Involvement
Year the initative began (yyyy) - 2000
Positioning in the Mosaic of solutions
Description of initiative - What is the main focus (products, services, etc.) of your initiative and how does it contribute to ending corruption? What avenues of corruption are you primarily addressing? What activities does it involve for your organization? Who are your primary beneficiaries and target groups? G-Watch provides tools and methods for ordinary citizens' participation in the monitoring of government service delivery programs. These were designed to answer the question that any ordinary citizen would want to ask: Is the government able to deliver what it promised to deliver? Thus, they basically revolve around the comparison of input and output, plan and accomplishment or expectation and actual result. The comparison takes into account variables, such as time (was the project finished on schedule?), cost (did the project exceed the budget?), quantity (did the beneficiaries receive what was allocated for them?), quality (were the goods produced in accordance with the agreed specifications?) and procedures (were documentation requirements properly accomplished?).
G-Watch contributes to ending corruption by integrating such participatory mechanism in actual government policies and programs, which opens up government transactions to direct scrutiny by the citizens. This is expected to guide and constrain the administrators and other players to appropriate actions and decisions. G-Watch is primarily addressing corruption in public expenditure, especially in the procurement and delivery of goods and services for various sectors. It has developed and tested tools to monitor textbook delivery, medicines procurement, school building construction, and public works projects. The activities of G-Watch include establishing partnership with government agencies for the conduct of the monitoring, direct transfer of the tools and methods to citizen groups and communities, and coordination of civil society monitoring initiatives that had been activated. These stakeholders, i.e. government agencies, citizen groups and communities, are likewise considered the beneficiaries of the G-Watch initiatives. Innovation - How does your approach differ from existing programs in the field? Which components of your initiative are particularly novel or unique (e.g. the products and services, the technology used, the delivery or financing mechanism)? While the usual anti-corruption initiatives would consist of expose, shame campaign against erring officials, and corruption perception survey, G-Watch chose a proactive preventive approach. It considers the correct delivery of services to the intended beneficiaries as the most important indicator that corruption has been contained. For developing countries like the Philippines, such link between anti-corruption work and development is crucial.
Now, the G-Watch approach is unique because it could bring about concrete results respected by both the government agencies being monitored and the citizen monitors themselves. It is anchored on the trust and confidence of both sectors that things could be accomplished. By being collaborative and inclusive, it puts anti-corruption work in the productive and optimistic mode. On the part of the government, it removes the notion that civil society is simply out to highlight social problems and make demands or go into fault-finding and head-hunting over controversies; and replaces it with the notion that citizens can share the responsibility of making program implementation more effective. On the part of the citizens, it opens up another avenue for civic engagement where the government's vulnerability serves as opportunity for citizens to become part of the solution that will bring the institutions back to their normal functioning. Delivery Model - How does your initiative reach its target populations? What communications mechanism(s) do you have in place? How do you measure their impact? With respect to government agencies, G-Watch always enters into a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA) to conduct the monitoring. The MOA ensures the government's cooperation, especially in terms of the citizens' access to all vital documents and information. It likewise ensures that the government officials will receive and act on the monitoring recommendations.
With respect to citizen groups and communities, G-Watch provides guide for monitoring and relevant information, briefing-orientations and planning-workshops to organize the monitoring initiative, and evaluation sessions after the conduct of the monitoring to generate learnings from the exercise. Key Operational Partnerships - What key partnerships have you established to make your model possible or more efficient? Who are your partners (business, social, government, other) and what are their roles? How central are these partnerships for your initiative. G-Watch has established partnership with the following government agencies: Department of Education (DepED), Department of Health (DOH), Department of Public Works and Highways (DPWH), Department of Budget and Management (DBM), Government Procurement Policy Board, and the Office of the Ombudsman (OMB).
Among its major civil society partners in the monitoring include the Boy Scouts of the Philippines, Girl Scouts of the Philippines, National Citizens' Movement for Free Election, Parents-Teachers-Community Associations, Transparency and Accountability Network, and Coalition Against Corruption. Financial Model - Which mechanisms do you have in place to ensure that your beneficiaries can afford your products or services? Do you have financial schemes or arrangements for low-income and marginalized populations? All G-Watch beneficiaries, whether from the government or non-government, get all the services for free.
Effectiveness - What has been the concrete impact of your project to date? How many people have benefited from your program in total? What policies, communities, or institutions have been influenced to make fundamental changes because of your work? The G-Watch monitoring reports have generated the following concrete responses from the government agencies: (1) DOH started posting medicines prices in its website as a response to reported high price discrepancies across regional offices and hospitals; (2) DPWH supported the pilot implementation of "Bayanihang Eskwela: The Citizens' Monitoring of DPWH-Implemented School Building Projects" in 2005; and (3) DepED launched "Textbook Count: National Textbook Delivery Program" in 2003 and runs it for four straight years now.
The G-Watch influence was felt most strongly in DepED's Textbook Count, a joint effort with various citizen groups to monitor the bidding, production and nationwide delivery of textbooks. Parents, students, Scouts, church parishioners and village leaders served as volunteer monitors for Textbook Count. This has benefited some 20 million public school students who received 64 million textbooks amounting to $52M from 2003 to 2006. Under the Textbook Count, which used the International Competitive Bidding, the prices of textbooks were also reduced by almost 50%, the procurement process (bidding to delivery) was shortened from 24 to 12 months, and ghost deliveries had been eliminated. The Textbook Count model was also replicated in other items, such as medicines, school buildings, and pork barrel-funded projects.
Scaling up Strategy - What is your priority for the next 3 years and please describe why. The G-Watch priorities for the next three years are (1) to sustain and institutionalize what had been successfully started, e.g. Textbook Count and Bayanihang Eskwela, (2) to systematically document the G-Watch experience and manualize its operations, and (3) to localize the G-Watch approach, i.e. establish franchises of the G-Watch model in at least 3 other universities (one in each of the major island groups of the Philippines).
The first ensures that the G-Watch's successful initiatives continue to flourish and remain good examples for other government agencies. The second is preparatory to the third or the localization plan, which is the way to efficiently multiply the use of the G-Watch approach. The G-Watch experience had proven that being housed in an academic institution enhances the credibility of the monitoring report and also increases the chances of getting the cooperation of the government agencies. That is the reason for offering the franchise to other universities.
Origin of the Initiative - Tell the personal story that will help people connect to your work. How did the initiative start? Was there a particular individual or event driving the idea? Tell the reader the story behind the innovation. G-Watch was formed in reaction to so many reports of corruption and inefficiency in the government of ousted President Joseph Estrada. To complement perception surveys, fresh college graduates were deployed as G-Watch monitors to visit project sites and collect documents to be used to assess actual government performance in service delivery. I was one of the first batch of monitors.
For the Textbook Count, G-Watch was fortunate to have DepED Undersecretary Juan Miguel Luz as guest in the presentation of monitoring report on textbook delivery program. He challenged G-Watch and the civil society to mobilize volunteers nationwide to check 37 million textbooks in some 5,000 delivery points. From then on, he became the G-Watch champion in DepED until he was removed from office because he refused to be used as conduit of illegal funds from the Office of the President. Main Obstacles to Scaling Up - List the two (2) main obstacles to scale up your innovation (policy, legal, organizational, people, financial, etc.)? 1. Financial instability
2. Local socio-political realities (personalistic character of local politics, primacy of kinship, prevalence of patron-client relations, etc.) that may make monitoring difficult or its results less credible. Main Partnership Challenges - What are your major challenges with partnerships? (E.g., identification of partners, implementation of partnerships, relationship management, etc.) The G-Watch partnership with the agencies and citizen groups has to be renewed every year. It is therefore unstable and unpredictable.
Leadership in boh government and civil society organizations also tend to change and sometimes transition is not so smooth that previous partnerships are sometimes not continued. Contact Information:
Redempto Parafina
G-Watch Director Ateneo School of Government (Academic Program) donsquare@yahoo.com Room 104 CSP Building, Social Development Complex, Ateneo de Manila University, Loyola Heights, Quezon City, Philippines Philippines Tel: (632) 4266062 Fax: (632) 4266062 Website: www.asg.ateneo.edu; www.g-watch.org (not updated) Discussions about this entry |

Hello,
My name is Rich Gottbreht from Global Insights and I am one of the entrants in the competition. Our work centers on helping anyone concerned about corruption learn about the subject through my book, our board game and its associated seminars, as well as low cost consulting. To find out more about us please visit our website www.globalinsights.biz. From the home page, you can link to information about us, our products and what people say about our products and services. From the details in the initiative we submitted you should also note that some of the proceeds from our sales will eventually go to a high integrity leadership development foundation. Also, if you are interested, down the road we will be looking for alliances and contacts in every country.
Thanks,
Rich Gottbreht